• Unique_Emerald_Sol_I@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    As a lay person with a modicum of interest in how these work, I’m vaguely aware that the modern paradigm (like with the cat farted) is to have multiple “specialized” models working in tandem called by the main thinking model.

    There’s probably a model doing the transcription, one doing a summary of the transcription, another being fed the summary to rephrase it according to the recruitment office’s instructions, et cetera. That’s on top of what I count as at least 5 models working in tandem for the interview itself (voice, video, “thinking”, emotion, memory).

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Wow, I didn’t realize that they were that specialized now. That makes a lot more sense than the One Big Model That Can Do Everything.

      • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Even when it’s “one big model” that “model” has usually been a moe for the last couple of years. Which is several smaller models in a trench coat. They each respond and the result you see is an amalgam.

      • Unique_Emerald_Sol_I@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t want to oversell my understanding of the topic, but I think at least the big corpo chatbots have the resources to run them entirely separately like that. I’m not sure how smaller models are compressed down or if they’re able to staple some of these specialist models into the main ones to make the One Big Model That Can Do Everything. Apparently text-based models are capable of doing image now so maybe they can?