I’m trying to figure out what the poster under the playboy one is, it feels super familiar

Gzip (any properly configured static server will serve compressed assets) probably compresses them down so probably a single extra byte per file

IIRC modern linter rulesets generally just outright error if you do anything remotely like this.

It was almost certainly software like a game

Before even local networking was really a thing, people were pirating games by just sharing the disks

Honestly not relatable for me, I don’t know if it’s because I’ve always been into finding new music, but 80-90% of what I listened to in school (2-3 decades ago) is still fire

There’s the odd bit of cringe in there (maybe some of the stuff from my nu metal era), but I can’t really knock my diet of Massive Attack, NIN, Chemical Brothers, The Smiths, Franz Ferdinand and Gatecrasher compilations. I’d still listen to any of it today

The owner is a twat who mistreats his staff and promoted shit political views

Cheap pints though

To be fair, we know the UK sucks, that kinda goes without saying

put my entire house to shame

Hey now, I’m sure you have managed to not have a 5cm gap below your doors

Depends where you draw the line on something being designer a bit, but if we’re including luxury brands in general, then essentially yes in most cases.

If someone cares about their appearance and they have enough wealth to not need to worry about economising, they will be wearing something close to the best versions of a given item of clothing that they (or their stylist) can get their hands on.

It doesn’t have to be flashy (and increasingly the goal is to not be flashy), you can spend hundreds, even thousands on a plain black t-shirt. If someone wealthy wants a black tee, it’s almost certainly gonna be one of those and not one from a supermarket.

Is the difference in value equivalent to the difference in quality? No of course not, the prerequisite is not needing to worry about the cost. There’s no value to them in shopping around for a deal and/or compromising due to cost, they just want the best available, and that’s it.

Now there’s the demographic of wealthy people who genuinely don’t give a shit what they look like, and instead dress like eccentric geography teachers, but even then, I don’t think they’re getting their clobber from a Walmart.

Edit: typo

Oh 100%, don’t buy any usb-c brick, but it’s pretty well understood which brands you can trust to do what they say at this point.

Other brands are available, but I’d say the last 5-10 chargers I’ve bought have been variants of the Ugreen GaN chargers and they do all the standard standards as well as the not so standard standards

If you tell Claude to commit for you it adds it then

Which highlights another situation of people telling it to let them handle the committing

Yeah I was gonna say, House flirted with everyone, even most patients

This. Get an appropriate usb-c adapter of the correct voltage to whatever-the-fuck barrel jack you need for your device

I will trust my ability to reliably select a decent USB-c charger plug much further than I do any third party power supply for any barrel jack.

All it takes to remove Claude attribution is something like this

git filter-branch -f --msg-filter 'sed "/Claude/d"'

That’s before realising things like DeepSeek don’t add the trailer

Be pleased that people are generally not trying to hide it, but also don’t trust its absence, look at the commit patterns

Unfortunate mistake

yeaaahhh…

No time for arguments, pipelines go brrrr

Well, not in most of the world

It really is quite interesting how brazen the “rules for you and not for thee” has gotten

Grand theft copyright and literal cybercrime?

Oopsie doopsie!

RetroAchievements has been going for a while now for several cartridge based consoles, I think anyone can define achievements (though there’s a fair level of skill required to do this), and then the community self moderates beyond that. They have a load of guidelines around what constitutes a good achievement