I mean I learned something about you today. So you’re right about that.

I’m staggered you think this is a good argument. Just wow.

After carefully observing the challenges in the market and reviewing the team needs for our next project, we’ve decided to make some staffing reductions. Several positions across Sucker Punch will be eliminated as a result. We know this is a lot to take in, and we want to assure you that we did not make this decision lightly. We have given this a lot of attention and worked to support our affected colleagues during this transition as well as we can… There’s no getting around that this is a hard day. Next week we will go into more details about the future.

The report adds that 26 employees have lost their jobs, which doesn’t sound like a huge amount compared to the job cuts we’ve heard recently at other game companies, but is nonetheless over 10% of the studio’s total workforce.

Then why didn’t 3.3 million sales in a month keep jobs?

I mean just like everyone else said. If things get bad you can always leave and join or create a different instance.

The whole point of Lemmy is that you don’t have to worry about it. Just make new instances. The only real issue is people holding on to their instances too long even though they’ve shown to be a problem. Which I’m not going to be throwing stones on cuz I mean I’m still .world user.

My question was why did you assume they made shitty houses? Why did you assume they got rid of regulations? Neither of these things were suggested even remotely in the article.

Also I don’t know where you got the idea that good regulation on homes slows down development. What we have is the exact opposite. Which is poor regulation which leads to shitty homes. And bad zoning laws which slows down development. Are you equating zoning laws and regulation? Do you think those are the same thing? Cuz they’re not.

Who said anything about stealing it? The person who paid still received the writing. They just didn’t get a copyright too.

No. Why would you say that?

Yeah I got to say the more and more I think about it, the more I think it is ethical. Because if you want to use his work in perpetuity you should hire him for the amount of time you use it. Or work out some kind of long-term profit sharing. If it’s for a one-time use of their skills you shouldn’t get to own the copyright of it. So yeah I’m going to say completely ethical.

Extremely? Really?

You are being given verifiable proof right here is this post that sales do not correlate with people keeping their job. Stop excusing corporate greed and anti labor practices by pretending you are helping workers.

Good on you giving credit to the photographer.