Credit: u/Waker_of_Winds2003

  • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cowboy is trying to make their entire upper stage a data center, so they’re more reliant on having their own rocket.

    AST… I don’t really get why they wouldn’t just work with Firefly to make a custom fairing or something. The launch crunch is still real now, and it’ll take years to replace the Falcon cadence, but I don’t see any way for them to be faster.

  • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t see the difference between these two and starship doing laps around the moon next year. It’s all bullshit.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      You and I see the same things.

      Makes me wonder what we’re missing. SpaceX seems to have beat everyone “to the punch”, yet all these other companies keep going (and I wish them well, monopolies are problematic).

      Is there that much more opportunity that we don’t see?

      • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        These two have a different business case than launch startups. Cowboy and AST are both focused on their satellites (data centers and direct to cell comms, respectively) and a way to launch them.

        SpaceX is pulling back from the commercial market, and a big part of Starlink success is the low internal Falcon 9 pricing vs what Amazon and Oneweb pay commercially. Vertically integrating launch can be a huge leg up IF (giant if) they actually pull it off.

        Blue Origin has announced their own comms and data center constellations. I wouldn’t be surprised if Relativity did the same.