• scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    How did they know at any given point that it was still there? Wouldn’t they have to interact with it to be sure, causing an explosion and annihilating it? The explosion would be incredibly small with just one particle. Is the lack of explosion their only evidence that they had contained it? I’m stumped as to what it actually means to have one particle like this. How can you even know what temperature it is without interacting with it? And how do you interact with it without destroying it?

    • Lonesome_Lorakian@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The particle does not have to interact directly with matter to be observable.

      Apparently they built what they called a “one-positron quantum cyclotron”, meaning they made their single positron “fly in a circle” with magnetic fields to trap it.

      That way you have a moving charge, which you can manipulate with electromagnetic radiation, microwaves in this case, the same way as you could with normal matter. That also means you can make your particle emit electromegnetic radiation that will tell you it is still there without touching anything.

      Still kind of mindblowing, that they can reliably detect anything coming from a single positron though.

  • mildseason@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    This is actually really exciting! I fucking love anti-matter, always been fascinated by it.

    If anti-matter can exist, why is our universe made of matter? This is the Baryon Asymmetry question that this research seeks to answer. The team has proven they can isolate a single positron. The next step is to measure it to as much accuracy as they have with the electron. Perhaps they will find differences!

    Summer '25 CERN showed that anti-matter baryons (protons, neutrons, etc) decay differently - link. So there’s a good chance they might find something!

    Would love to actually see anti-matter but that’s a long way off. Really hope anti-matter likes to stick together and we could actually build atoms out of it. Would be crazy to study the properties of anti-water! Maybe that’s just science fiction. In any case, very excited for the coming research!

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      “Would love to actually see anti-matter” - are you being literal here? because that would require a vacuum between your eyes and antimatter that emits at a visible frequency. Not entirely impossible, but detection and recording of an anti-hydrogen transition wavelength is more easily achievable. This might be no more than an LCD display indicating a non-zero number though. Exciting for sure, but not necessarily a visual spectacle.

    • nomad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I always assume it’s the same reason why are have mostly right handed people. It’s just that the scales tipped at some point and it had to go down one way from that point.

      • Uli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I think the universe actually is perfectly balanced between antimatter and matter, but variation across space emerged as space expanded and our entire observable universe happens to be in a pocket where there was more matter than antimatter.