“Former President Trump Dies in Federal Custody”
“Tesla and SpaceX File for Bankruptcy as Musk’s Personal Fortune Collapses”
“Supreme Court Overturns Citizens United in Landmark Campaign Finance Ruling”
“Congress Passes 90% Top Marginal Tax Rate on Billionaires; Markets Rally”
“Constitutional Amendment Abolishes Electoral College”
“President Declares National Climate Emergency, Ends All Fossil Fuel Subsidies”
“Netanyahu Arrested on International War Crimes Warrant”
“Senate Passes Medicare for All Bill”
“AI Development Halted as New Federal Regulations Take Effect”
“Unsealed Epstein Documents Name Additional High-Profile Figures”
“Justice Department Breaks Up Amazon, Google, and Meta”
“President Signs Executive Order Cancelling All Federal Student Debt”
“House Passes Sweeping Assault Weapons Ban”
“IRS Reports Record Revenue After Wealth Tax Implementation”
“Economists Declare End of Capitalism as Worker Cooperatives Dominate”
“Supreme Court Restores Roe v. Wade Nationwide”
“Putin Dies; Kremlin Announces Succession”
“Tesla Stock Plunges 50% After Musk Social Media Post”
“Bipartisan Bill on Housing Reform Passes Both Chambers”
“New Law Bars Private Equity Firms from Residential Real Estate”
This is actually a fair use of an LLM. Nobody’s going through this thread to make a stack of headlines, but the AI summary here is kinda neat. And that’s from someone who generally loathes AI giving me a summary.
It’s not a summary of this thread. I gave it the title and the platform in question and asked it to make an educated guess on what the responses here are going to be like.
No thinking required here as is demonstrated by said machine accurately predicting major part of the responses to this thread, including yours. This is nothing but a roll-call for people to come parrot and upvote the popular, broadly accepted talking points.
Yeah! So how about you go through this thread and make headlines out of the most popular responses. Sound like a PITA you wouldn’t do in the first place? Y’all acting like this was a school assignment and OP cheated. 🙄
Technically speaking, no comment is necessary and few are solicited. I found it a bit amusing, you didn’t. No big deal either way. Bonus! OP wasted yet more AI compute for free, hastening the AI downfall but a trillion small cuts. I’m fine with that.
It wasn’t a summary of this thread. I gave it the title and the platform and asked it to come up with the most predictable responses. It never saw what was already written here. Also, I’m paying 30 euros a month to use said AI.
This isn’t something any of us would have been thinking about compiling in the first place. Using an LLM in this case made a cool list. Everyone here acting like you cheated on a school test that required thought.
On a theoretical level yes, but due to how my mind works I tend to find joy in things other people don’t, and vice versa not find it in things other people do.
You only know it’s an LLM because I told you so. The content itself is in perfect alignment with the rest of the comments here. Just highlights how unsurprising and predictable the responses here actually are. I could’ve picked any of those and posted it here, without mentioning the source, and I would’ve been showered with upvotes. This isn’t a difficult game to play which is why I’m not even playing.
It produced response one way or another. Is there something wrong with it content-wise? Because even in the case of it being a direct quote taken from somewhere else, it would only further make my point: this place being a caricature of itself to the point that articles are being written about it.
I asked an LLM to simulate this thread:
“Former President Trump Dies in Federal Custody”
“Tesla and SpaceX File for Bankruptcy as Musk’s Personal Fortune Collapses”
“Supreme Court Overturns Citizens United in Landmark Campaign Finance Ruling”
“Congress Passes 90% Top Marginal Tax Rate on Billionaires; Markets Rally”
“Constitutional Amendment Abolishes Electoral College”
“President Declares National Climate Emergency, Ends All Fossil Fuel Subsidies”
“Netanyahu Arrested on International War Crimes Warrant”
“Senate Passes Medicare for All Bill”
“AI Development Halted as New Federal Regulations Take Effect”
“Unsealed Epstein Documents Name Additional High-Profile Figures”
“Justice Department Breaks Up Amazon, Google, and Meta”
“President Signs Executive Order Cancelling All Federal Student Debt”
“House Passes Sweeping Assault Weapons Ban”
“IRS Reports Record Revenue After Wealth Tax Implementation”
“Economists Declare End of Capitalism as Worker Cooperatives Dominate”
“Supreme Court Restores Roe v. Wade Nationwide”
“Putin Dies; Kremlin Announces Succession”
“Tesla Stock Plunges 50% After Musk Social Media Post”
“Bipartisan Bill on Housing Reform Passes Both Chambers”
“New Law Bars Private Equity Firms from Residential Real Estate”
You’re allowed to use your brain instead of letting a machine do your thinking for you
This is actually a fair use of an LLM. Nobody’s going through this thread to make a stack of headlines, but the AI summary here is kinda neat. And that’s from someone who generally loathes AI giving me a summary.
It’s not a summary of this thread. I gave it the title and the platform in question and asked it to make an educated guess on what the responses here are going to be like.
Oh. Well that’s not nearly so fun.
No thinking required here as is demonstrated by said machine accurately predicting major part of the responses to this thread, including yours. This is nothing but a roll-call for people to come parrot and upvote the popular, broadly accepted talking points.
You’re like that guy in an episode of Friends that no one liked because he thought interacting with other humans in any way was beneath him.
Nah, it’s not me you’re not liking - you don’t even know me. You just don’t like what I’m saying and I’m perfectly okay with that.
Yeah you demonstrated that
Yeah! So how about you go through this thread and make headlines out of the most popular responses. Sound like a PITA you wouldn’t do in the first place? Y’all acting like this was a school assignment and OP cheated. 🙄
Also completely unnecessary. Nobody required anybody to summarize the thread. Stop being contrarian.
Technically speaking, no comment is necessary and few are solicited. I found it a bit amusing, you didn’t. No big deal either way. Bonus! OP wasted yet more AI compute for free, hastening the AI downfall but a trillion small cuts. I’m fine with that.
(This comment unnecessary and unsolicited.)
Actually your last point about using more compute resonates with me, so now I have changed my view, thank you (being 100% sincere, not snarky)
It wasn’t a summary of this thread. I gave it the title and the platform and asked it to come up with the most predictable responses. It never saw what was already written here. Also, I’m paying 30 euros a month to use said AI.
Not predicting. Just saying what others have said already.
I gave it no link to this thread. Only the title and the platform and asked it to predict the most likely responses.
This isn’t something any of us would have been thinking about compiling in the first place. Using an LLM in this case made a cool list. Everyone here acting like you cheated on a school test that required thought.
But… why?
To demonstrate a point.
Lol you’re missing out on the galactic orgy crumbum.
And trump didn’t just die, he died on a toilet. OR he was given 500 years of life to serve a 400 year prison sentence.
Also also, this thread is for fun. Do you know what fun is?
On a theoretical level yes, but due to how my mind works I tend to find joy in things other people don’t, and vice versa not find it in things other people do.
If we wanted to see LLM responses, we wouldn’t be here but in a chatbot window…
You only know it’s an LLM because I told you so. The content itself is in perfect alignment with the rest of the comments here. Just highlights how unsurprising and predictable the responses here actually are. I could’ve picked any of those and posted it here, without mentioning the source, and I would’ve been showered with upvotes. This isn’t a difficult game to play which is why I’m not even playing.
Stop doing that.
Make me.
Ahhh. So you’re a child. Got it. Blocked.
You do realise all that stuff was made up by other people and the AI didn’t make anything up, right?
It produced response one way or another. Is there something wrong with it content-wise? Because even in the case of it being a direct quote taken from somewhere else, it would only further make my point: this place being a caricature of itself to the point that articles are being written about it.
Sounds pretty damn good to me.