• stateofaffairs@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Meanwhile in California, over 50% of the population voted against taxing billionaires via Prop 40. I don’t understand that one at all. The fear mongering worked, I guess.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah well the standard line they always trot out whenever anybody starts talking about taxing billionaires is the threat of the billionaires leaving. The thing is, if they were actually prepared to do that they wouldn’t spend all the money fighting it, they would just wait until it happened, and then leave.

      Billionaires don’t really care about tax, it’s like the least expensive thing they spend money on in a year. They’ll quite happily spend 10,000 times as much on a yacht, it’s like asking an average earner if they would consider moving to get out of paying a 40 cent annual surcharge.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        Yep, Billionaires are where they are. In general, they do not move when tax laws change (of all billionaires moving per year, only a single digit percentage can be brought in connection with wealth taxes)

      • ElDuderino@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Billionaires don’t really care about tax,

        I think they do. Money going to tax is under public control and cannot be used to buy influence.

        • patchy2eyes@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s just about power. Their influence comes from their wealth and paying taxes would mean giving power away.

    • meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Probably cause half the people currently sleeping in their car in Californian cities are worried how it’ll affect them eventually when they finally get their start-up off the ground and make their first billion

    • cloudshouter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The very shallow take that taxing the rich will make them move somewhere else or hurt jobs. They are already hoarding the money and jobs are based on other factors. If the rich moved around based on taxes, they wouldn’t live in any western countries at all. Terkministan would be the prime destination. They live in places like California and New York because they like it there, otherwise North Dakota would be the new hotspot in the US.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The billionaires bought two fake propositions to cancel out 40, then they pushed endless ads about saying that your retirement, schools, hospitals, etc. woudl be destroyed by yes on 40, no on 41, no on 42.

      AKA Capital and its state doing what the enslavers concocted it to do - violently defend their disgusting privilege at the expense of everybody else.

      The violence in this case is the attack on healthcare, etc.

  • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is unironically how the right sees Trump and his ilk though. Vividly remember a conversation between two family members when one said “why are people mad? He just wants to make America great again.”

    Not sure the point I’m trying to make tbh. Just be careful with how we envision “our” candidates in our minds.

      • zoltanshields@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Once I get Talarico’s face tattooed on my chest and fly a “Talafreako” flag on the back of my truck every day and wear a “Time To Start Flipping Tables” hat to every Thanksgiving with my family for the next ten years then maybe we can have a cautionary conversation about idolizing politicians.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Do you thibk his supporters don’t care about the rape allegations, or do they just not believe them?

    • cloudshouter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      By that logic, vote for the Democrat who wants to make America even better. Yeah, they absolutely take him at his word (except when he’s calling them stupid or denigrating military personnel, etc) but don’t listen to people who have receipts.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I always think it’s funny how people on the right seem to think calling someone a liberal is an insult. Yeah, dude, you correctly identified my political position, it wasn’t really a secret though.

    • spirinolas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Bike lanes??! Bicycles are too dangerous not to mention socialist! So many kids will die there won’t be any left to get shot at school!

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You’re looking to put countless insurance brokers, private health care workers and others out of a job while simultaneously decimating the automotive industry, and for what? A brighter, cleaner healthier future for your children?

      You monsters.

  • sompreno@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Lets not treat politicians like well intentioned individual when lying to get into power is common.

    • spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Nono shhhhhh we voted in midterms, that’s aaaaaaall we have to do! Let’s not pretend like there’s a huge mass of republicans and morons that will be getting gaslit and manipulated even harder for the next two years, and there’s definitely not an even more important vote then that Dems will surely try to stuff some milquetoast candidate into!

      Nonono, now is the time to celebrate and pretend things are fixed like a light switch being flipped!

      • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Within 12 hours of polls closing, we see one of the biggest electoral smackdowns ever, and fucking Blexas. Dems don’t take power for a few months yet.

        If you’re not a whiney pessimist, this is exactly the time to celebrate!

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They even want federal healthcare for everyone! What other evils will they impose on our society?

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Bike lanes suck.

      They’re better than no bike infrastructure at all, but they’re still suck city compared to dedicated bike paths with physical barriers between cyclists/cars and even cyclists/pedestrians.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 hours ago

        they suck on stroads, yes. they’re mostly fine in tight downtown areas alongside a single vehicle lane.

        I think most people refer to physically separated bike paths that share the same road surface as bike lanes. personally, I don’t really like completely separate bike paths (around here, most commonly multi use paths), because they’re not actually designed as infrastructure, but as recreation, so connections and directness are poor.

        but, yes, just tossing in a bike lane is not the proper solution, it’s a bandaid on the way to a complete infrastructure replan. and fuck you Ontario for blocking them and ripping them out

        • ms.lane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’d build those gosh darned commie railways, reduce roads* by a lane to make real dedicated bikeways and build euro style 4-5 story apartment blocks with retail on the ground floor and make it all walkable!

          muahahahahah!

          * Roads being Roads, not Streets or Highways.

          • motionofethre@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            BE GONE SATAN🙏🙏🙏✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️

            THE BIBLE THUS SAYSITH JESUS SHALL RETURN ON THE BACK OF ADODGE RAM

          • spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Unfortunately you’d have to solve the wage theft problem first unless you want only execs and the yuppiest yuppies living there. They were making similar plans in a not so terribly lefty city, to tear down a few neighborhoods and some not even old office buildings to build something similar. It wasn’t for any utopian plan, but to further gentrify a core part of the city and make the land owners and developers filthy rich. There was no option to be grandfathered in. They were just going to tell hundreds of families and businesses to fuck off if they couldn’t afford to move into where they already lived.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I hate riding my bike on streets. I’m lucky my area has dedicated bike zones all along the main streets, separated by barriers. I wish more side streets had them, as well. I wish f’in everywhere had them.

      • Bev's Dad@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Unprotected bike lanes are actually worse than nothing so yeah.

        I miss living on the Toronto harbourfront and being able to bike an hour in either direction along the lake with very minimal interactions with cars…

        • cheers_queers@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 hours ago

          the other day i watched a car slip into the bike lane for 100yards. good thing cyclists around here know better than to take the road.

    • AmyAye@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Bike lanes are fine but also can we start ticketing bicyclists who fail basic road rule safety like blowing off stop signs and lights?

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        If bikes are violently forced to drive like cars against all reason, then car brians will be crying even louder while bicyclists are murdered at even higher rate.

        Serious question: Imagine I’m sitting on my bike in front of your car at a red light. Which option would you prefer?

        • We both follow the supposed “law”. - I wait until the light turns green. I slowly accelerate from a stop to 12mph. You ride my ass for a block, then we repeat at the next light.
        • I follow the “law”. - You randomly run me over because of road rage or drunk or distracted or bad driver or fash terror or whatever.
        • I break the “law”. - I run the red light. When you get the green light, I’m half of a block ahead of you. If you catch up with me, I dip onto the (empty) sidewalk so you (and any other cars) can pass, then I drop back into the street behind the traffic.

        I take option 3 because it’s better for the cars and much much safer for me. Car laws don’t make sense for bikes. Car brains really have no idea what it’s like out there. Height of privileged mentality.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 hours ago

    "CLEAN!? SAFE?!!? but how the fuck is that meant to generate profit for shareholders!?!

    Nobody is giving me a brown envelope full of cash to build a new PARK

    What a disaster for freedom and democracy"

  • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “We’re funding numerous infrastructure projects to finally modernise our infrastructure!”

    “WHAT ABOUT POTHOLES!!! ARE YOU ROAD PHOBIC!!! THE RADICAL LEFT HAS DONE IT AGAIN, FUNNELING MONEY INTO CORRUPTION!!!”

    • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The radical left fixed my streets and now they’re all woke, no potholes or sinkholes or anything. They even sealed the asphalt and repainted the lines, how could they!?