• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I once worked at a place where we had to put signs up telling people not to put paper towels in the urinals. Three of us had a coordinated investigation going on to figure out who was doing it, we were down to only two or three suspects before the signs went up.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I love that this is clearly ChatGPT, too.

      Can you imagine writing that prompt? On a work computer?

      • BambiDiego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Sometimes class elitism is called cultural differences.

        Often times people (or towns, or cities) who use bins for toilet paper is because their plumbing can’t handle the toilet paper being thrown into it, and upgrading it is just prohibitively expensive.

        And then they get called gross, or weird, or outdated culture, when it really is just “I didn’t choose where I was born.”

    • Deme@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Except if it was just generated by a sloperator for a dumb joke, which is almost certainly the case here :/

  • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Excuse me, WHAT DO YOU MEAN THAT THE BIN IS FOR TRASH AND THE TOILET IS FOR POOP‽

    I’ve lived completely deceived, swindled, scammed… I won’t believe in anything again…

  • fartographer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Tbf, they’re incorrect that flooding poop helps plumbing do anything. This is obvious propaganda from Big Clog.

    • Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Recent immigrants from countries with bad plumbing sometimes continue to throw out toilet paper. The pipes in some countries can’t handle it

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I suspect that’s why my wife pats after using the bidet and throws it in the trash can. No, there’s no smell or poop or anything gross in the slightest, but it’s a bit odd.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Right, got it, so I pee in the bins? I mean I must do, or else what are they there for?

  • AliOski@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe it is because I am not a native english speaker, but why is the feces/poop/shit called “number 2 waste”? Never heard of that expression.

    • plm00@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      From internet: “In schools (especially from the 1960s onward, though likely earlier), kids held up one finger to ask to pee and two fingers to ask to go “number 2”.”

      The expressions have stuck around ever since.

    • NathanDerWeise@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Number 2 waste” is an unusual phrase to native speakers (or at least THIS native speaker), but this poster is made with AI.

      “Number 2” by itself is commonly understood to mean “poop.” Children will usually say “I have to take a number 2” instead of “having to take a poop” because it’s considered more polite. Number one is pee, by the way.

      As for the origin of this phrase, I have no idea. It’s very very common, at least in the USA.

      • AliOski@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the Netherlands the “elegant” cryptic way of referring to it is “de grote boodschap” [the big/great message], ie “I need to deliver the great message to the toilet”.

    • Ixoid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      So many wrong answers to your question. It’s simple - number “two” rhymes with “poo”, leaving number one to be pee.

      • AliOski@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That sounds like it doesn’t make any sense… why is pee not called number three, then? Maybe you thought of that explanation yourself when you were little?

    • Beanson@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean you still don’t put the whole dump in the bin though, just the paper you used. Pretty common in a lot of countries.

      • redordit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        Saw a sign saying “dont throw toilet paper into the toilet” in a middle eastern country last summer and was very confused.

          • Hal@piefed.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Toilet paper also requires specific processing of the waste water. It’s normally screened off and sent to landfill when it reaches the treatment plant, but I imagine many countries wouldn’t have this infrastructure.

            • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              18 hours ago

              In the USA anyway toilet paper is legally required to dissolve in water within a certain time frame. Maybe this is not the case in other countries

              • Hal@piefed.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                It’s still screened off and sent to landfil. “dissolve” isn’t really possible with paper, just breaking into smaller parts.

                I’m no expert, but I’m guessing the rules are about the pipes between flushing and treatment, as I can imagine a slurry of toilet paper bits is a lot less likely to create blockages than a mountain of wet wipes.

                • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Yes, that makes sense. Not dissolve in the technical sense of form a solution in water, but more of the layperson sense of “disintegrate” into that paper slurrey and not cause blockages in pipes.

                  We all know that if you have too much paper and not enough water, it will block a pipe. But given typical usage, it should be safe for USA-code pipes since it disintegrates into that “slurrey.”

                  TIL that the water treatment plant screens it out and disposes of it! I imagine this is part of the process where they screen out other solids as well

              • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                ask any water treatment plant worker and they will tell you, that is a dream, toilet paper shouldnt be flushed at any situation