• Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I too would betray NVIDIA for her.

    Or for the price of a nice dinner.

    Actually waking up on the wrong side of the bed would be enough to make me willing to betray NVIDIA.

  • Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Man, you’re a billionaire, you have enough money to open a managed and fully consensual sex club. I don’t understand billionaires at all.

    • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I don’t have to do the stupid self censoring here, right? The one that’s really easy for the ai mods that they’re trying to outsmart?

      I always wonder how these people have enough time to even get accused of all this many accounts.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The greatest condemnation of the billionaire class is that none have made the Calyx of Isis

      (Yes I’m referencing niche porn that’s older than I am)

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    [Deleting “Would” meme not for national security reasons, because obviously that was the joke. But because it’s been pointed out that the woman in the photo is not the woman from the headlines. And that’s fucking awful, and we should all feel ashamed for dog-piling on her.]

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Seriously. She could have me wrapped around her fingers and all I know about her is she’s a suspected spy.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    damn sweet rack undrr an angel face be hard to resist spilling info for a roll

    • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “I have this really neat trick I can do, like put my heels all the way behind my head. Do you have any neat tricks? Like, international trade secrets?”

      “You betcha!!!”

  • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nobody’s trying to honeypot me, I’m probably not even on some watchlist, what a waste.

    • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You’re surprised lemmy libs didn’t do their homework before jumping at the chance to be xenophobic and bigoted about China, lol? You new here?

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh gosh, now I feel bad for joking about it. I guess it was stupid of me to assume this was actually the person from the headlines.

      Sometimes I forget how deplorable some internet users can be, and it just doesn’t cross my mind that somebody would use a different person’s photo to make a meme about this.

      I hope it doesn’t impact the life of the person in the photo too much. But since it appears google AI is already labeling her as the spy, then it likely will affect her in unfortunate ways. That’s sad.

      • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wouldn’t worry too much about the person for reasons I will explain below but I would def take it as a lesson to check your assumptions.

        The meme predates that affair and was pretty generic, more like ‘China/DPRK bad’.

        There is suspicion that Alice Huang is working on behalf of china, but she’s also a CEO of a tech company so she’s not some random 20 something. She’s also a public figure (insofar as a tech CEO is), and you can see photos of her if you google her name.

        As for the person in this photo, the photo is almost 10 years old and the image search is giving the wrong name. Taking a stranger’s photo to make a meme is wack and in this case probably racist, but I don’t think people are going to assume she’s the individual in the news.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I see. So whoever it is likely already knew she had been made into a meme and won’t wake up tomorrow to a devastating surprise. That still doesn’t make it right though.

          And you’re correct, it is extremely racist to use an instagram photo of a unassociated Korean woman as a meme format about Chinese spies. And it’s misogynistic too. She didn’t ask to be defamed and drooled over.

          If humans had any decency then we wouldn’t use random people’s photos in unrelated memes. Public figures are one thing, or pictures from news articles or photo shoots. Personal photos from social media is crazy though.

          Then again, it wasn’t that long ago that putting any photos of oneself on the internet was seen as crazy, and then for some reason social media came around and started normalizing it. Zucking fuckerberg.

          Anyway, as for the alleged spy from the recent headlines, I personally don’t care and if this was solely about her then I’d say it doesn’t matter. But it’s not, it’s about the person whose photo it is and the real impact and harm that something like this can have on a person’s life undeservedly.

          As for Jensen Huang, I really don’t give a damn about him and I’d say we can dogpile on him as much as we want, for thinking with his dick (which surely no lemming would ever do!). And, you know, committing infidelity.

          I just think if people are going to meme it, they should use the real people’s photos, or draw them or something. wait scratch that don’t draw them

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      People don’t seem to care about the actual source, they just want to see themselves as expert AI detectors for some reason.

      …Doing that is physically impossible, hence the high false positive rate.


      And similarly, others who assume that’s the woman in the headline… err, aren’t too concerned about information hygiene anyway.

      • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        I can see the argument for why the image in the OP was suspected, and normally I just glaze over such comments because idgaf but I remembered this meme from a little while back and I knew I could find it fairly quickly

        The internet loves being mad (and I’m not perfect either tbh)

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thats the joke.

      Edit: apparently not, you’re right I just didn’t scroll down enough to see the train wreck.

  • Ramsesder13te@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Women are way to emotional and lacking self control to make important decisions” Meanwhile men:

    I know people or even sexists rarely say that nowadays but I’m just “wow” on how this reflects on outdated stereotypes.

    • AMA@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I know people or even sexists rarely say that nowadays

      buddy, I envy you for the people you live around

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I want to go live in the land of progressive sexists. If only to see how they do it.

        “She has worked hard to become the most respected member of her field. Also she got a nice rack on her, fwarrr”